Gwyneth Paltrow’s Brand Sued for ‘Plagiarizing’ an Alternative Brand in the Industry

Gwyneth Paltrow’s Brand Sued for ‘Plagiarizing’ an Alternative Brand in the Industry
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Frazer Harrison

Gwyneth Paltrow is under major scrutiny for the recent allegations of plagiarism. The actor, who is also a successful business owner found herself in the hot soup when another company sued her. Goop, Paltrow's women's health company, is relatively new in the industry and aims to establish itself among competitors. To achieve this, it's crucial to become a recognized brand in niche markets per Marca.

Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Rick Bowmer-Pool
Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Rick Bowmer-Pool

Thus, Goop decided to launch a label on its products with the message: "Good. Clean. Goop." This move, however, sparked a legal battle with another company in the sector, Good Clean Love. They offer similar products to Goop and argue that Paltrow's brand message bears a striking resemblance to their company name. "Use of the GOOP house mark does not negate the similarity between the marks, but aggravates it, because use of Goop may create reverse confusion by leading consumers to believe that Goop, and not Good Clean Love, is the source of Good Clean Love's products," the lawsuit read as per Marca. This isn't the new case with the brand as it came under harsh criticism previously in June 2017, Goop promoted $120 stickers, claiming they were designed to "rebalance energy frequency" within customers' bodies.

Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by RB/Bauer-Griffin
Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by RB/Bauer-Griffin

Created by Body Vibes, Goop reportedly asserted that the stickers were constructed from the "same conductive carbon material NASA uses to line space suits to monitor astronauts' vitals during wear." However, Mark Shelhamer, former chief scientist at NASA's human research division, dismissed Goop's claims, stating that space suits aren't made with carbon and, even if they were, it wouldn't be for monitoring vital signs. "Not only is the whole premise like snake oil, the logic doesn't even hold up," Shelhamer said. "If they promote healing, why do they leave marks on the skin when they are removed?"



 

Later in a statement, the Body Vibe stated, "We apologize to NASA, Goop, our customers, and our fans for this communication error ... We have learned that our engineer was misinformed by a distributor about the material in question, which was purchased for its unique specifications. We regret not doing our due diligence..." As Goop expanded into a prominent lifestyle brand, it introduced "wellness summits" advertised as featuring "talks and panels" with Paltrow and offering "intimate workshops, all-day food and drinks, and self-care galore," as outlined on its website.



 

However, one attendee who paid $5,700 to attend a London-based wellness summit in June 2019 had a different experience. While the mention of God may seem rather intense, spending $6,000 only to leave dissatisfied is arguably excessive. Nonetheless, a representative from Goop refuted the negative allegations when speaking to Page Six. "The overwhelming response to our London Summit was incredibly positive," they said. 

Share this article: Gwyneth Paltrow’s Brand Sued for ‘Plagiarizing’ an Alternative Brand in the Industry
More Stories on Inquisitr