Cheryl Hines Slams Biden Over No Secret Service Protection After Double Intrusion at RFK Jr.’s LA Home
Amid the alarming events of intruders breaking into their Los Angeles home, actress Cheryl Hines echoed her concerns about the urgent need for Secret Service protection for her husband, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In an exclusive interview, Hines revealed the petrifying incidents that unraveled at their Brentwood estate, highlighting the necessity for heightened security measures for her husband, who is currently running as an Independent in the 2024 Presidential Election. Looking back at the distressing incidents, Hines disclosed that she was on Instagram Live when she observed a stranger trying to enter their property, not just once but twice.
This daunting experience, occurring at their family home, struck a deeply personal chord for both her and Kennedy Jr. She underscored that the Kennedy family had previously encountered tragic historical events, with the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, adding an extra layer of prominence to the security concerns. The gravity of the situation emphasized the necessity for more robust protection, specifically in the context of RFK Jr.'s independent campaign in the forthcoming presidential election. Hines showcased her dismay, detailing their efforts to seek Secret Service protection for her husband, only to face dismissal from the Department of Homeland Security.
The frustrating reasoning portrayed by the DHS was that RFK Jr. didn’t meet the polling criteria, as security and protection are typically considered for candidates polling at least 15 percent. However, a recent survey according to the sources of TMZ indicated RFK Jr. polling at 19% in a hypothetical three-way race involving Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Hines insinuated the weightage of this situation and requested to reconsider, hoping the White House would re-evaluate this incident, especially considering the potential impact RFK Jr. might have on the election outcome. Hines was a bit calculated with her words, but her implications are clear; the recent intrusion can not be ignored or downplayed. Hines' plea to the White House arises from genuine concerns, indicating that this recent incident should catalyze revisiting the request for enhanced security measures.
The interview sheds light on Hines' worry and frustration regarding the denied Secret Service protection. It highlights the necessity for escalated security for her husband and chimes with her apprehension about the situation being downplayed in the essence of its potential electoral implications. The disturbing incident poses a concerning question: Is the denial of protection influenced by the possibility of RFK Jr. significantly impacting the upcoming elections? Hines' strong appeal makes it visible that the issue transcends mere personal security and navigates the broader political landscape. As the Kennedys grapple with the aftermath of these disturbing intrusions, Hines’ call for heightened security for her husband takes on significant weight, emphasizing the severity of the situation and the potential implications it might have in the political arena.
