‘The View’ Panel Gets Heated as One Co-Host Said Donald Trump’s $355M Ruling Was ‘Excessive’

Published on: February 22, 2024 at 6:26 AM
Cover Image Source: YouTube | The View

In his New York civil fraud trial, former president Donald Trump was found guilty of misrepresenting his assets to obtain loans from multiple banks, and as a result, he was sentenced to pay out $355 million. The ‘hot topic’ naturally became a subject of heated discussion on the popular talk show The View , where co-host Sara Haines ruffled the other hosts with her subtle stand for Trump.

Haines believed that the sum was ‘excessive’ and ‘slightly supported’ Trump’s claim that the case was brought forward for political reasons. “Although I always agree with someone being accountable and held to task and in a little bias, I love seeing Trump held to task because he rarely has been — I do think and this is not due to any emotion towards Trump, I think the punishment was excessive,” she said.

“My criticism of this is not because I feel any sorrow for Donald Trump. But I do think that he is an instigator of sowing distrust in institutions,” Haines explained. “It’s his one thing. ‘Everyone’s completely kind of against him. It’s a political witch hunt. It’s personal.’ This ruling, to the number it has been held, is slightly playing into the optics that this was political and personal.”

As per Mediaite , Haines described the case as ‘all legal ,’ but she also pointed out that there weren’t any direct victims, as in a case involving a pharmaceutical business being sued for a product or even in the former Trump University case. Haines mentioned that a $25 million settlement was paid to the victims of that ‘scam.’

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The View (@theviewabc)

“But the number was proven by evidence. There’s a paper trail,” co-host Sunny Hostin said in retaliation for Haines’ viewpoint. “It didn’t come out of nowhere,” moderator Whoopi Goldberg added. Given that there were no ‘lingering’ debts, Haines maintained that the figure was still disproportionate.“I just think the number is excessive to prove the point and hold him accountable,” she said.

Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Rob Kim
Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Rob Kim

“Not if you say that you have a billion dollars,” Hostin added. She earlier questioned Trump’s finances and predicted his wealth would likely be revealed when he needs to cover at least a portion of the $350 million (he’d also need to show he has more than that amount to get a loan for a percentage of it to put down). “Either we say we want people to go to trial and get their comeuppance or we don’t,” Goldberg said while concluding the discussion.

As per The Wrap , Judge Arthur Engoron noted during the ruling that “They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money. The documents prove this over and over again. This is a venial sin, not a mortal sin. The defendants did not commit murder or arson. They did not rob a bank at gunpoint. Donald Trump is not Bernard Madoff.” He continued, “Yet, defendants are incapable of admitting the error of their ways. Instead, they adopt a ‘See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil’ posture that the evidence belies. This Court finds that defendants are likely to continue their fraudulent ways unless the Court grants significant injunctive relief.”

Share This Article