Woman Accuses Man Of Rape, But Facebook Proves Her A Liar

Rape and sexual assault are no joking matters. However, one woman was about to frame a man for this crime, until Facebook intervened.

It’s amazing how people can live with faking sexual assault and getting someone thrown in jail over the lie.

What has to go through the “victim’s” mind at the time? Is there a conscience present or not?

Fortunately for the “suspect,” technology was on his side. Both (victim included) are remaining nameless, according to National Post.

‘Sexual Assault’ Past

According to the source, this rape case supposedly began in 2009. That’s when the two exchanged conversations via Facebook.

The woman is actually the “assaulter’s” former wife.

The woman notes that he raped her while they were separated, and he was living with his new partner.

She mentions that he forced himself on her three times, all non-consensual.

Yet, the man says the truth is the total opposite of her testimony.

https://twitter.com/marinnnnaaaaa/status/795023288368033792

Seven years later, the woman’s words would come back to bite her — as far as her testimony is concerned, anyway.

Is It Rape Or Not?

During the initial trial, the woman spoke undeniably about her sexual assault encounter.

Let the “victim” tell it, there was no possible way that sex was consensual with the man.

https://twitter.com/punk_flop/status/795361363631702017

During the trial, the man remembered their conversation via Facebook and advised the court to take a look for itself.

However, the jury at that time didn’t accept the evidence due to procedure. The source mentions the following statements.

“The complainant maintained she had no memory of sending the message, and further testified she didn’t think she had done so. In any event, after the prosecution objected on procedural grounds, Superior Court Justice Guy Di Tomaso ruled against further cross-examination and directed jurors to set aside the evidence they had heard about the post.”

Yet, authorities sent the case to a higher court and issued an investigation regarding the Facebook message.

After conducting an expert forensic analysis on the man’s new wife’s computer, investigators were able to find the message.

It was unaltered and authentic.

NEW TONIGHT on @CTVBarrieNews at 6: how a Facebook message led to a 2011 sexual assault conviction by a #Barrie jury being quashed.

— Tony Grace (@tonygracectv) November 4, 2016

The Appeals Court stated there was no denying the information. It mentioned as follows.

“The message was allegedly sent about midpoint in the time frame of the sexual assault allegations. It would not be unfair to say that the message recounted several incidents of sexual activity between the appellant and complainant, and made it clear that the sexual activity was consensual on the complainant’s part.”

That Moment You Remember It Wasn’t Sexual Assault

Wouldn’t you know it, after being presented with the results of the investigation, the woman had an “oh yeah!” moment.

Suddenly, she remembered she, indeed, had consensual sex with her ex-spouse.

According to Voice for Men, this happens more often than not.

https://twitter.com/CaptHaddock83/status/790541356737372160

The evidence showed quite the contrary, regarding her sexual assault story. According to the courts, her testimony was “inconsistent” with what the personal messages presented on the stand.

The National Post mentions that both sides noted the Facebook message was believable.

So, of course, that particular trial was tossed. Yet, a new trial was ordered.

However, in light of the new evidence — at the request of the defense and prosecution — the court decided to stay the trial given her credibility. This ended the case, altogether.

Man saved from sexual assault conviction due to 7 year old Facebook message https://t.co/xDXyMpwhxb

— Roosh V Forum (@rooshvforum) November 6, 2016

Unfortunately, there are stories upon stories of women who have lied about being sexually assaulted.

For half a million dollars, you can find a lot of people who will lie lie… https://t.co/QDew287Nyd

— The Loose Truth (@hyperloose) November 7, 2016

And, I don’t even like Trump. But, the crime could happen. That’s generally an automatic harsh punishment for the convicted. If it’s warranted, by all means, it’s justified.

However, if it’s some kind of personal vendetta to “get even” regarding some type of disagreement, that should also warrant judicial punishment.

Should it not?

The source doesn’t mention whether the woman will be sentenced for lying about the fictitious sexual assault incidents.

What do you think will happen? Feel free to share in the comments below.

[Featured Image by Rich Legg/iStock]